In , sociologist and ordained Episcopalian minister Laud Humphreys published his book The Tearoom Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public. Ethics Controversies: Case Studies – Debates about the ethics of the Tearoom Trade Study Methodology. In the ‘s PhD student in sociology Laud. Tearoom Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public Places. 2. \; f! ri. ‘; i’. ~j. ~. ” I. I.j. Ij. ‘e.:~ f :’ t. lAUD HUMPHREYS. ‘”,. “,. At shortly after five o’clock on a weekday.

Author: Maum Nara
Country: Barbados
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Automotive
Published (Last): 15 October 2017
Pages: 121
PDF File Size: 18.42 Mb
ePub File Size: 1.93 Mb
ISBN: 153-3-21198-359-3
Downloads: 49802
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Shakakinos

By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

This page was last edited on 12 Novemberat Often, these men and their wives were deprived of sexual relations with each other. There were also social costs. If discovered, knowledge tearoomm the deviant sexual behavior would threaten the stability of their families. These roles included an insertor, an insertee, and a lookout referred to as a watchqueen.

However, years after publishing his study, Humphreys spent some time in a jail for an unrelated incident. He also bore witness to their illegal activity. In addition to recording the sex acts of over men Humphreys had a small subset who knew hummphreys was a researcher and spoke to him about sex in public places and homosexuality which was in the s criminalised in the United States.

Research ethics materials wimba 2.doc

Louis, Missouri to pursue the PhD in sociology. The study was met with mixed reviews when published. The University of Wisconsin.

On one occasion, an undercover patrolman actually revealed to Humphreys that law enforcement was upregulating activity in a certain area of a park due to an increase in African-American visitors, an event unrelated to the tearoom activities.

Laud Humphreys and the Tearoom Sex Study

This left some subjects in a position where their sexual desires were not met by their spouse, who avoided both the use of contraceptives and the chance of an unintended pregnancy.

Humphreys’ book is based on his Ph. Thirty-eight percent of Humphreys’ subjects clearly were neither bisexual nor homosexual. The Best and Worst of Sociology. While conducting his study, Humphreys often took on the role as watchqueen in order to convince others that he meant no harm, giving him the ability to observe tearoom interactions. He preached a message of acceptance and tolerance to any who would listen, and embodied these principles by ministering mostly to the LGBTQ community.


Remembering the many contributions of Laud Humphreys to sociology and the study of sexuality”. Table of Contents Key questions Example of harm from social science research – Research merit and integrity Justice Special protections for vulnerable communities Ethics Controversies: Impersonal Sex in Public Placesone of the most famous and controversial studies in sexology.

If the police had got hold of Humphreys’ data or if the identities tearooj the men involved had been revealed, they would have been severely stigmatised, their family lives ruined, they could have lost their jobs, or even been arrested and imprisoned. That is, only tearooom percent were members of the gay community and were interested in primarily homosexual relationships Humphreys, Those who were willing to talk openly with him tended to be among the better-educated members of the “tearoom trade.

Police officers were aware of several tearoom locations. Humphreys also concluded that such encounters were harmless, and posed no danger of harassment to straight men. They wanted only some form of orgasm-producing action that was less humphrwys than masturbation and less involving than a love relationship.

Laud Humphreys – Wikipedia

Merely engaging in sexual acts with the same gender could merit an arrest, and this risk increased significantly if trae acts were conducted in a public facility. There were several different roles that a man might take on during a tearoom interaction.

He moved to California, earned certification as a trad, and established his own private counseling service. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. He recorded the names, license plate numbers, and addresses of around men.

Laud Humphreys and the Tearoom Sex Study

Impersonal Sex in Public Placesan ethnographic study of anonymous male-male sexual encounters in public toilets a practice known as “tea-rooming” in U.

Around the time Humphreys conducted his study, many superhighways were being constructed, and the rest stops along these roads provided ideal tearoom facilities due to their numerous locations and ease of accessibility. Most have found his most serious ethical violation the way he disguised himself and went to mens’ homes on a false pretext, invading their privacy. His impact on research and thinking about men’s public sexual encounters. These restrooms were known as “tearooms”. Research ethics materials wimba 2.


Yet, despite the benefits of this research, The Tearoom Trade raises ethical questions about sociology research: Under the guise of a social health surveyor, Humphreys interviewed the subjects about their lives without disclosing that he had already met them before. Becker at Northwestern University from”Humphreys was enormously rrade on graduate students and younger scholars in the field of deviance, ethnography, and what we called ‘participant observation’.

They were men whose marriages were marked with tension; most of the 38 percent were Catholic or their wives were, and since the birth of their last child conjugal relations had been rare.

The Author Laud Humphreys entered the field of sociology after serving laid ten years as a clergyman in the Episcopal Church. During this time, teraoom accounted for the majority of homosexual arrests. A year later, he changed his hair, dress and car and went to the home of 50 of these men.

After spending some time in this harsh environment, Humphreys admitted that he questioned his own ability to resist if the authorities had questioned him. Schacht, who participated in the SSSP session. The turmoil resulted in numerous other unfortunate events, including a fist fight among faculty members and the exodus of about half of the department members to positions at other universities. Schacht notes that this fact “makes it one of the best selling lwud ever written by a sociologist.

Falsely presenting himself as a social health worker, Humphreys traveled to the homes of the subjects and asked if he could conduct a social health survey. However, anti-sodomy laws currently exist in the law books of twelve states. Humphreys’ findings destroy many stereotypes. After changing his hair, attire, dress, and car, Humphreys visited the homes of the subjects. The psychology of human sexuality.

Fifty-four percent of his subjects were married and living with their wives, and superficial analysis would suggest that they were exemplary citizens who had exemplary marriages.

He completed his dissertation ingraduated with his PhD